| Matlock Bath: Promenade Gardens, with Gas Lamps, about 1902 |
| Matlock Bath : Twentieth Century Photographs, Postcards, Engravings & Etchings |
| |
|
|

Gas lamp on the Prom |
|
Two more views of the Promenade and North Parade, both showing
lamp posts that may have only just been installed when the pictures were taken. The card's postal date
is some years after the original image was taken. The images
on the previous page shows the nearer lamp post
surrounded by both a canvas awning and a stage that must have been movable.
The lamps were lit by gas and the Local Board, later
the Council, would have had to employ people to both
light and extinguish them. In 1891 Isaac Rowland
was living in Matlock Dale and employed as a lamp lighter,
whilst Edward Woodward of Cromford had
the same occupation.
Ten years later Edward Woodward was living in Matlock
Bath and still working as a lamp lighter, presumably
for Matlock Bath[1],
and at the same time John Ward of Cromford was doing
the same job.
In 1903 we find that another man, Joseph Pidcock of
Matlock Bath, was also employed as a lamp lighter[2].
The job wasn't without risk and in 1902 Matlock Bath
District Council were asked to pay a doctor's bill
for a lamp lighter who had fallen from a ladder[4].
Nor was it well paid. For example, although it
involved a neighbouring Council rather than Matlock
Bath itself, Matlock UDC advertised for a Foreman lamplighter
in 1903 offering wages of 24 shillings per week. They
also advertised for two lamplighters who were only
to light and extinguish lamps who were to be paid 11
shillings per week.
|

Seasonal Greeetings on this card of the Prom |
|
In the late autumn of 1897 Matlock Bath's Local Board's
Finance Committee met to discuss, amongst other matters, how to save money.
It was recommended that lamp lighting on the promenade should be discontinued
until the beginning of March the following year. The report presented was adopted
unanimously[3]. There was, however,
no mention of whether the full wage of the lamplighters should continue to be paid.
Although the postcard on the left has a divided back, the sender ignored it, using
the whole of the back for the name and address of the receiver and writing her message
on the front margin. As well as greeting her cousin, she was also asking for pictures
of Joan of Arc (Jeanne d'Arc).
It is impossible to read any of the shop signs. There is writing on the sun awning
of the shop on the right of the lamp post but the only word that can be deciphered
is Matlock.
Below is another card of the Promenade and the Parade, probably photographed from
the same position, that was used for a Christmas Greeting in 1902. At this time postcards
still had undivided backs, solely for the address of the recipient. However, this card
had a small enough picture for a message to be written underneath.
|
Related images:
|
Images:
1. "Matlock from Gardens". The Wyndham Series No.2092.
Postmarked London 17 Oct 1904 and sent to France.
2. "Matlock Bath". Portrait Postcard posted 24 December
1902, although here is an earlier postal date of Jul 1899 for another
card like this.
Postcards in the collection of, provided by and © Susan
Tomlinson.
Researched by and © Ann Andrews. Intended for personal use only
|
References:
[1] Isaac Rowland in the 1891 census |
Edward Woodward in the 1901 census
[2] "Derbyshire Times", 11 April 1903. Witness at
a trial.
[3] "Derbyshire Times", 13 November, 1897. Matlock Bath Council.
[4] "Derbyshire Times", 18 October 1902. The
lamplighter's name was not mentioned.
[5] "Derbyshire Times ", 23 September 1903, although
in 1896 Melbourne lamplighters were earning "the usual salary of" 14s. per. week.
|
|