Matlock's bridge was, historically, was one of the few crossing
points along the length of the river. The bridge dates from
the fifteenth century and "the stone bridge of four arches
was extensively altered and widened in 1904"[1].
The bridge was a subject favoured by artists, including Joseph
M W Turner. This postcard is not dated but is from an oil painting
by Henry Hadfield Cubley,
an artist who lived in Matlock Bath at the beginning of the twentieth
century.
"These old county bridges were first erected for
pack-horse and pedestrian traffic only, and when wheeled vehicles
came in they had to be widened. Those who planned and carried
out these enlargements, with a strange perversity, made the arches
of different designs from the old. Thus at Matlock Bridge on
the northern side the arches are elliptical, while on the southern
they are pointed[2] ".
Benjamin Bryan[2] mentioned
how inadequate the bridge had become by 1903: it
was clearly too narrow for the traffic using it as, at meeting
of the Local Board on 6 Jan 1890, "a letter
from the County Surveyor was read stating that the bridge was
then 21 feet wide".
This 1890 meeting was just
one of many meetings following "a
petition in favour of widening [which] was presented to the Court
of Quarter Sessions in April, 1874", though in the July of
the same year it was decided the inhabitants should widen the bridge
themselves.
In 1890 The County Surveyor estimated that it would cost about £700
to widen the bridge by just under 10 feet.
In 1893 Derbyshire County Council's Bridges and Highways Committee
reported that a further application had been made that the bridge
over the river at Matlock may be widened, but the committee recommended
that the Council should only do this on the locality providing
one half the cost[3].
A year later Mr Slack, chairman of the Local Board, thought the
bridge was dangerous and commented that there was "scarcely
a stone on the parapet of the structure which couldn't be thrown
over"[4]. This
was partly in reaction to an accident that had happened during
the previous week and partly to prepare the ground for another
meeting with the County Council, when the figures below were submitted.
Survey of traffic crossing Matlock
Bridge, August 1894[5] |
|
Foot passengers |
Vehicles |
Friday 10th August |
6,261 |
1,026 |
Saturday 11th August |
9,694 |
1,163 |
The Bridges and Highways Committee (April 1896) ordered the
repair of the footpath over the bridge and new kerb stones, which
would only cost the County Council the princely sum of £15.
Another year went by, and another. In 1902 a journalist writing
for "The
Derbyshire Times"
commented that when Matlock Bridge had been inspected
in 1896 the the old portion
of had been found to be in good condition, but the "new
portion" on
the north side, built about 40 [sic, 140[6]]
years ago, was tumbling down. "It was recommended that the
bridge should be widened by ten feet, to allow a footpath on each
side. The cost was estimated to be £3,700 at that time, with
Matlock Council contributing £500. The decision was communicated
to the Council, was discussed and then forgotten. The bridge requires
considerable outlay in repairs, and application has been received
from the Matlock Urban District Council that it may be also widened"[7].
On 26 May 1902 Matlock UDC concluded that re-pitching the bridge
would be a waste of money and the proposal to widen the bridge
was the only sensible option.
At that point they also wanted to lower the bridge by fifteen inches
but this later proved impossible because of buried gas pipes and
other utilities not far under the road surface. It was also suggested
that, if the bridge ever needed to be widened further, there was
space for a girder footbridge on the Hall Leys side. Job Smith
presided at a meeting of Matlock UDC in July 1902 when the special
rate of sixpence in the pound was formally agreed. This was to
defray the cost of both the Council public celebration of the Coronation
of Edward VII[8] (£150)
and also the Council's contribution of £500 towards the
widening of the county bridge[9].
It had only taken a quarter of a century reach that stage!
Further reading:
Read
Moore's description of Cromford Bridge in 1818 This also
has arches that differ in shape.
"The
AutoChrome Album of Matlock & District". Scroll
down the page to see a coloured picture of Matlock Bridge before
it was widened.
The
Long and Winding Road
A selection of Cubley's paintings of Matlock & Matlock Bath
that are on this web site:
|
References:
[1] "Kelly's Directory of Derbyshire",
1941.
[2] Bryan, Benjamin (1903) "History
of Matlock - Matlock, Manor and Parish" London by Bemrose
& Sons, Limited.
[3] "The Derby Mercury",
11 October, 1893.
[4] "The Derby Mercury",
15 August 1894, reporting on the meeting of 7 Aug.
[5] "The Derby Mercury",
22 Aug 1894. Submission to Derbyshire County Council's Bridges and
Highways Committee by members of Matlock Local Board, to try to make
the point about the inadequacy of the bridge.
[6] "The Derby Mercury",
5 June 1772. Derbyshire, Easter Sessions.
[7] "The Derbyshire
Times and Chesterfield Herald", 2 Aug 1902.
[8] King Edward VII was crowned on 26 June
1902.
[9] "Derby Daily Telegraph",
22 July 1902. A few days later the Derbyshire Times and Chesterfield
Herald recorded that the sum for the Coronation celebration was £200,
not £150.
|